Ford Mondeo 2007 vs Mercedes E class 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 39 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
800 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Mercedes E klase 2006 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes E klase 2006 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 540 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`105 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |