Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Mercedes E class 2009

 
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2013
Mercedes E class
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 145 HP184 HP
Torque: 185 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds8.4 seconds
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 39 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 120 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
850 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 500'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 19 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Galaxy, Ford S-MaxInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes SLK
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.87 m
Width: 1.89 m1.85 m
Height: 1.50 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 2 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 554 litres540 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 14 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes E class. The Mercedes E class may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0902`150
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Mercedes E class has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 46009800
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv