Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Chrysler 200 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 28 HP less power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 10.2 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`143 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |