Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 48 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 219 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |