Ford Mondeo 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eleven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 24 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 66 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |