Ford Mondeo 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf 2013

 
Ford Mondeo
2013 - 2018
Volkswagen Golf
2013 - 2017
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 240 HP300 HP
Torque: 366 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds4.9 seconds
Ford Mondeo engine produces 60 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Volkswagen Golf.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.46.9
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 375 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway930 km on highway
610 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.28 m
Width: 1.85 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.44 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 60 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 429 litres343 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 86 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`980
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Golf scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 4008200
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv