Ford Mondeo 2013 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Ford Mondeo
2013 - 2018
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 240 HP150 HP
Torque: 366 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Mondeo engine produces 90 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 156 NM more than Mazda 6.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.46.1
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Mondeo consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 495 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway1260 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.85 m1.84 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo and Mazda 6 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 429 litres483 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Ford Mondeo has 54 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
Mazda 6 scores higher in safety tests, butFord Mondeo is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

above average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 4006600
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher children safety
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv