Ford Mondeo 2013 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 199 HP | 259 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
Chevrolet Malibu is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 60 HP less power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Chevrolet Malibu. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.5 | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 73 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox, Chevrolet Traverse | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Malibu might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo and Chevrolet Malibu are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 461 litres | |
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 32 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 1`649 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |