Ford Mondeo 2013 vs Mazda 6 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 249 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo engine produces 28 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Mazda 6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.1 | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo and Mazda 6 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 438 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`965 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |