Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 46 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Scorpio | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1610 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`955 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Mitsubishi Galant quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |