Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Volvo V40 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 19 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |