Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mazda 626 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 76 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 14 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.0 | |
| Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Escort | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1610 litres | 1315 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 110 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |