Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.8 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 177 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds13.2 seconds
Ford Mondeo 1996 and Ford Mondeo 1996 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Mondeo 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo 1996 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 1996 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1290 km on highway
910 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo 1996 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.56 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.37 m
Ford Mondeo 1996 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo 1996, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo 1996 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1610 litres1290 litres
Ford Mondeo 1996 has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo 1996 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 1996. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo 1996 (by 320 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0101`860
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 600600
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv