Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 46 HP less power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1610 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |