Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo 1996 engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Mondeo 2003, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Ford Mondeo 2003. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo 1996 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 1996 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo 1996 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo 1996 is smaller. Ford Mondeo 1996 is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo 2003, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo 1996 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1610 litres | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo 1996 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo 2003, which means Ford Mondeo 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`030 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford Mondeo 2003 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo 1996 has serious deffects in 240 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo 2003, so Ford Mondeo 2003 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |