Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Mazda 6 2002

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 170 HP162 HP
Torque: 220 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds12.3 seconds
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.710.5
Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway810 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years16 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Tribute
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Ford Mondeo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.69 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mondeo is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres490 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1700 litres1712 litres
Ford Mondeo has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 12 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1052`025
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1200800
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv