Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Despite the higher power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2003 2.5 engine: The LCBD engine features a multi-point fuel injection system, where each cylinder is equipped with its own injector for precise fuel delivery. This system is highly durable and reliable, with a low likelihood of ... More about Ford Mondeo 2003 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 23 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1630 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`105 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Octavia, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |