Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Citroen C5 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 138 HP | |
Torque: | 245 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Citroen C5 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 48 HP less power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Citroen C5. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |