Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP90 HP
Torque: 280 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds13.6 seconds
Ford Mondeo 2003 is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo 2003 engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford Mondeo 1996, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Ford Mondeo 1996. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1190 km on highway
860 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.67 m
Width: 1.81 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Ford Mondeo 2003 is larger.
Ford Mondeo 2003 is 13 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo 1996, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo 2003 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1700 litres1610 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo 2003 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo 1996, which means Ford Mondeo 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`140 kg2`010 kg
Net weight:1`551 kg1`416 kg
Load capacity:589 kg594 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:Ford Mondeo 2003 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo 1996 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo 2003, so Ford Mondeo 2003 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv