Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Mazda 6 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1712 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo has 35 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |