Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Volvo V40 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo engine produces 9 HP more power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 32 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1421 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 127 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 279 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |