Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Citroen C5 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Mondeo engine produces 2 HP more power than Citroen C5, but torque is 2 NM less than Citroen C5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Citroen C5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Citroen C5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C5 has
| |