Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Ford Mondeo 2000

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 130 HP125 HP
Torque: 175 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds11.2 seconds
Ford Mondeo 2003 is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo 2003 engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Mondeo 2000, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford Mondeo 2000. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.47.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km8.3 l/100km
By specification Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2000, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2000.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1000 km on highway
670 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km500'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo 2000 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years7 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Ford Focus
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo 2000 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo 2003 and Ford Mondeo 2000 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1700 litres1700 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Mondeo has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv