Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Volvo V40 2002

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Volvo V40
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 125 HP122 HP
Torque: 170 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds10.5 seconds
Ford Mondeo engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.2 l/100km
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1000 km on highway
700 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 500'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Ford FocusUsed also on Volvo S40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.48 m
Width: 1.81 m1.72 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 32 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1700 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`030no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv