Ford Mondeo 2005 vs Renault Laguna 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 60 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo and Renault Laguna are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 32 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`107 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |