Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo XC70 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 75 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max, Ford C-Max | Used also on Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.60 m | |
| Ford Mondeo and Volvo XC70 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1680 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo has 86 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo XC70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo XC70, so Volvo XC70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |