Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo XC70 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 45 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2007: The car is equipped with Haldex (Generation III up to 2008 and Generation IV since 2008) proactive automatic four-wheel drive. Haldex analyzes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50/50 torque split. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.60 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1680 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 86 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo XC70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo XC70, so Volvo XC70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |