Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo V70 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 23 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 2 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1680 litres | 1580 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 86 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |