Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 489 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1680 litres | 2325 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 645 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`290 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`592 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 698 kg | 770 kg | |
| Ford Mondeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |
