Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo and Skoda Superb have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Mondeo 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
| Ford Mondeo and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1680 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 114 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |