Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1520 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
1160 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.63 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 45 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1680 litres | 1684 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has 57 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 4 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 5200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 6.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |