Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Renault Laguna 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 17 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 3 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1680 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 19 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |