Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Mazda 6 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 6. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 scores higher in safety tests, butFord Mondeo is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |