Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V90. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Volvo V90 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo has 72 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |