Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo and Skoda Superb have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Superb. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Superb can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Superb version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Skoda Superb 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1585 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 365 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`330 kg | 2`085 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`601 kg | 1`445 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 729 kg | 640 kg | |
| Ford Mondeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Superb scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |