Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 60 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1650 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1800 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 1120 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 6 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1585 litres | 1593 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Laguna (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`107 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`515 kg | 1`595 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 755 kg | 512 kg | |
| Ford Mondeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Renault Laguna. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |