Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 120 HP less power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 210 NM less than Volvo V90. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1650 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1800 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 1120 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1526 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo has 72 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |