Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mazda 626 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 26 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mazda 626. Despite the higher power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 42 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |