Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mercedes E class 1993
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 20 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 18 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`950 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |