Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Seat Toledo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 24 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
| |