Ford Mondeo 1996 vs SAAB 9-3 1998

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP130 HP
Torque: 158 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11 seconds
Ford Mondeo engine produces 14 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 19 NM less than SAAB 9-3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.09.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1000 km on highway
730 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.63 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
Ford Mondeo is 7 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1290 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7901`600
Safety:
Quality:
low

high
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 7.8/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv