Ford Mondeo 1996 vs SAAB 9000 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 34 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 57 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.9 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is smaller. Ford Mondeo is 20 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.6 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |