Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 68 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 220 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 460 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |