Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mazda 626 1997

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 138 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds12.6 seconds
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo and Mazda 626 have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 626. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km8.3 l/100km
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1030 km on highway
720 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.58 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
Ford Mondeo is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1290 litresno data
Mazda 626 has more luggage space.
Ford Mondeo has 42 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8051`680
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Mazda 626 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 6.7/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Mazda 626 has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv