Ford Mondeo 2001 vs Seat Arosa 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 55 HP more power than Seat Arosa, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Seat Arosa. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 3.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 118 cm longer than the Seat Arosa, 17 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1370 litres | 790 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 370 litres more trunk space than the Seat Arosa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1 metres more than that of the Seat Arosa, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`445 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`460 kg | 965 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 480 kg | |
| Ford Mondeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Seat Arosa. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Arosa, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |