Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Hyundai Atos 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 82 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 70 HP more power than Hyundai Atos, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Hyundai Atos. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Atos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Focus | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 123 cm longer than the Hyundai Atos, 31 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1064 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 237 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Atos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 306 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Atos, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Atos has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |