Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Ford Mondeo 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2007 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo 2003 engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Mondeo 2007, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford Mondeo 2007. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 2003 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2003 2.5 engine: The LCBD engine features a multi-point fuel injection system, where each cylinder is equipped with its own injector for precise fuel delivery. This system is highly durable and reliable, with a low likelihood of ... More about Ford Mondeo 2003 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2003 is smaller. Ford Mondeo 2003 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo 2007, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo 2003 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1460 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2007 has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo 2003 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 2007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo 2007 (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo 2003 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo 2007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Ford Mondeo 2007 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo 2003 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo 2007, so Ford Mondeo 2007 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |