Ford Mondeo 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo 2004 engine produces 45 HP less power than Ford Mondeo 2010, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Ford Mondeo 2010. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo 2004 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo 2004 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 2004 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo 2004 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Ford Galaxy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Mondeo 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2004 is smaller. Ford Mondeo 2004 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo 2010, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo 2004 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 486 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1390 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo 2004 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 2010. The Ford Mondeo 2010 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo 2010 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo 2004 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo 2010. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Ford Mondeo 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo 2004 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo 2010, so Ford Mondeo 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |