Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo and Mitsubishi Carisma have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 15 NM more than Mitsubishi Carisma. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1050 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |