Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP121 HP
Torque: 280 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1250 km on highway
860 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.69 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres501 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litresno data
Ford Mondeo has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9801`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv